The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart represents the weight assessment of people of Charlestown in the year 1995 and 2015. This report will evaluate the data given.
Overall, people from the age 20 to 25 were mostly underweight or ideal during both the given time period. Furthermore, obese people were the least in the past whereas it became a major weight issue for the people in the last given year.
In both the years, 70% of the young people had ideal body weight. For the people age 30-39, the percentage of overweight issue increase from 20% to around 45%. Similarly, people of this age category were also seen having obese body weight in 2015 which was 10%.
On the other hand, 60% of people with ideal body weight over the age 40 declined due to the rise of obese people from 5% to around 25% in 2015. Likewise, people with obese body weight also increased dramatically to a high of 50% among the 50-59 age category. It can also be seen that almost 60% of the people over the age 60 had obesity in 2015 whereas more that 80% of the same people maintained a healthy weight during the year 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-12 | dantesw | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | Hường Nguyễn8 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 11 | view |
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Success in business can be assured if you have great marketing and promotion. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51269035533 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.201267148 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2678921362 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163041152791 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084652773237 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545866312957 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125614241406 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488158976888 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.