The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
The graph illustrates the numbers of passengers in London’s Underground Station during a day.
Overall, the data represented on the graph indicates that the number of passengers in underground station in London fluctuates throughout the day. Major fluctuations last 4 hours and they clearly occur twice a day. Firstly one is revealed in the morning between 6 to 10 am and the second begins at 16 pm and ends in 20 pm. In fact both follow almost the same pattern which is an upward trend until the number of passengers peaks then falls dramatically hitting a low-point. Only the first one has a higher number of passengers than the second after hitting the lower-point. Unlike these periods, the middle of the day has a slightly less change in the numbers of passengers, meaning that the difference between the highest and lowest point is lower than in first two mentioned periods. In contrast to these trends at the end of the day the numbers of people passing through the station are relatively stable.
The graph indicates that from 6 o’clock the number rises four times from 100 number of passengers during the next two hours. When it reaches the peak it drops significantly until the end of the following two hours counting little less than 200 people. Similar trend spreads from 16 to 20 pm. Once the number increasingly rises to 18 pm it hits the highest point of little under 400 passengers. After that it rapidly falls to the number of 125. From 10 am the number slightly grows to 200 in one hour and grows rapidly by the end of the second then slowly until 14 o’clock by the number of 300. Finally, it has a major decrease of the passengers number to 100. Conversely, in the last two hours from 20 to 22 pm the numbers rises slowly from 125 to little above 150 just to have a slight decrease to the number of 145.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ph illustrates the numbers of passengers in London's Underground Station dur...
^^
Line 11, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f passengers during the next two hours. When it reaches the peak it drops significan...
^^^^
Line 11, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Similar trend spreads from 16 to 20 pm. Once the number increasingly rises to 18 pm ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 400, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t point of little under 400 passengers. After that it rapidly falls to the number of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, second, then, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 327.0 196.424390244 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67889908257 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64254160235 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8309518919 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323388236529 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132930507449 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160168775064 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333311297321 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170804989372 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.