some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. others think that money should be spend on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment conservation. discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Housing is essential for people. Some argue that the government should offer free housing for people who cannot afford it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Undoubtedly, having accommodation is of great importance for some people. It is believed by some that the authorities should provide non-price houses for people who are unable to afford this. I agree with this idea that instead of free of charge dwelling due to its consequences, government should facilitate the means for buying houses by giving home loans easily and curbing the price of them.
Firstly, it seems possible that the government fail to provide free housing for all people because this action needs a large amount of money. In other words, if a large sum of budget is spent by officials in order to develop free apartments or houses, there might be several problems in management and development of other sections such as education or public transportation. Since the building construction is costly process, they have to use poor quality materials. As a result, the people who are living in these places might face with dangerous events such as earthquake or occasional floods.
On the other hand, it is highly likely that the best possible approach in order to tackle this issue is taking appropriate measures by officials to facilitate the ways of having houses. This means, the governments should overcome the economic barriers and pave the way so that the persons who have financial problems are able to get loans from banks for buying house. Another crucial step that should be taken by government is curbing the price of lands and houses. By doing this, the cost of houses will not be affected by annual inflation or tax. Consequently, the people who are under poverty line can afford to buy a house with their annual saving budget.
In conclusion, it is argued by some that government should be held accountable for providing free houses for poor people. However, in my mind, authorities should assist individuals in order to take loans for buying houses. If they controlled the price of building successfully, people could afford the houses by their saving.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01114206128 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67032580271 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520891364903 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7719357696 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16523125736 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057886688315 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395513588385 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105712753265 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013230824611 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.