The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001.
The provided table illustrates the total money spent on six different items by family in Australia per month in two years (1991 and 2001).
Overall, it can be seen that the total Australian dollars was spent in 2002 was higher than 1991. In addition, almost the money spent on all items rocketed except in clothing and transport plummet.
Looking at the data in more detail, it is clear that in terms of electricity and water , it showed the most money provided, with 75 dollars in 1991 and 120 dollars in 2001. Also, other goods and services increased from 250 dollars to 270 dollars in 1991 and 2001 respectively. In addition, both housing and food climbed by 5 dollars in the money specified for them.
Turning to the remaining items, it is evident that there was a considerable plunge in money spent on transport from 70 dollars in 1991 to 45 dollars in 2001. Moreover, in terms of clothing , the chart shows a sudden drop.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | shayma | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | abhushek_saha | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 71
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- the diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 11
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r that in terms of electricity and water , it showed the most money provided, with...
^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in 2001. Moreover, in terms of clothing , the chart shows a sudden drop.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7256097561 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48476998325 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6552214681 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183582579386 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080087140966 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668401794558 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12232968227 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628274609024 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.