Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are one of the most important pillar of success in flourishing a society. Children are the future builders of a society who should be train properly by teacher to turn them to successful person in society. Some people believe that teachers respected more in past society than today, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, in past time people appreciated teachers more than today for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that people respected teachers more as there are few educated people in the society in past. In the past, technology didn't develop a lot and people didn't access to various source of knowledge. Therefore, they consider teachers as source of knowledge and wisdom which gain great amount of value for teachers. For example, when I was kid, I live in a small village where there was no educational equipment even my parents were illiterate like other people there. My teacher was the only person that have a lot of information in each field. All the time people met him to get his advice about different issues as a wise human. As a result, my teacher gained a lot of respect because of having knowledge which is rare on that time. As you can see, abundance of illiterate people in past led to increase amount of value a teacher could obtain.
Second, today teachers aren't well-educated which leads to having less value. In today's competitive world people prefer to have high rank jobs which provide them with more money and obviously better life. Hence, smart people tend to choose fields like engineering, and medical which has high revenue that cause lazy students to became teacher as obligation of society's situation. As a result, teachers of todays have less knowledge. For instance, statistics demonstrate that the respect and knowledge of teachers decreases as time goes. Researchers' investigation reveals that teachers lost their respect due to not only intelligent people prefer to opt other career, but also the less revenue of this job discourages people to choose it. So, people who could not be able to gain a position to other fields choose to become teacher reluctantly. If teaching had better income to encourage people to opt it as their career, it would have same respect as past.
In conclusion, I do believe that teachers of past time have more value and respect among people. Not only teachers were considered as only wise and educated person, but they also have great amount of knowledge. I think each society should pay more attention and appreciate its teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | marysv | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | peymankaz | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Sinor | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | ghazalsaed1995 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school Use specific reasons and examples to support your position 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trained'?
Suggestion: trained
...ure builders of a society who should be train properly by teacher to turn them to suc...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ld an opposite attitude. In my view, in past time people appreciated teachers more than t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... is that people respected teachers more as there are few educated people in the so...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... are few educated people in the society in past. In the past, technology didnt develop ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ociety in past. In the past, technology didnt develop a lot and people didnt access t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...chnology didnt develop a lot and people didnt access to various source of knowledge. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...uld obtain. Second, today teachers arent well-educated which leads to having les...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 46, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...nclusion, I do believe that teachers of past time have more value and respect among peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9627039627 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58370763112 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1618661348 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5652173913 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82608695652 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190605791424 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653236247113 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484906377278 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147160805352 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537919136419 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.