It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The neighborhood we live in play very important role in our lives. It is where we spend most of our times and grow up there. It can affect our personality. If a movie theater were going to be built in my neighborhood, some residents would believe that it is a great idea; others would disagree. In my view, building a movie theater would be a positive addition for two important reasons.
The main reason is that building a movie theater can create a lot of job. In order to build and then run it, a lot of people in different career will need. This means that many people have opportunity to work. For example, my friend lived in London and a new theater built on there last year. He states that many career like architects, engineers, constructors and so on worked for built it and after that it started to advertise job opportunities for run the theater. Now a lot of people work as actors, sellers and other parts of it. As you can see, people would have these opportunities for work only because of building a new movie theater.
Another reason is that a new movie theater will be a good place for entertainment. In our neighborhood there isn’t any places for people to spend their free time useful. By building a movie theater, a cultural place would build for people entertainment. For instance, Jane usually goes to the movie theater after her school. She talks a lot about how she enjoys spending time there and learning a lot about a lot of dramas. She states that before building a movie theater she and her friends always spent their times by computer games that had a lot of disadvantages. This experience taught me that by building a movie theater we could spend our time more enjoyable and useful.
In sum, though some may oppose this plane, building a new movie theater would be a great addition to our neighborhood. Not only could it create a lot of new job opportunities but also it could be a place for spending our time and entertain. Every city should attend this part of community much more than before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Andres01 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | dew2222 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | gaoxiangluke | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | bahram1993 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species . 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...hat building a movie theater can create a lot of job. In order to build and then run it, a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57923497268 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63793533993 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464480874317 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.587834266 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1818181818 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167484559799 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618039258739 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566162667343 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12107221814 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252511130059 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.