Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating?
Nowadays, in modern society, according to extent of food products, people's health is a significant issue for governments because there are a lot of companies which most of them offer low-quality foods, but people do not know this topic. In recent years, governments have tried to introduce healthy foods in different ways, but others stand on the other side of the continuum, believing that the government could not solve these conditions, I disagree with this statement and I think that governments did their tasks carefully. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, now governments use public media such as Television, radio, internet, newspaper and, etc., to show rich food products. Up to date, through this system governments have been able to present a lot of food that they have high nutritional value. So, people have a lot of choices for eating. For example, last month I read news on the internet about black tea. The writer of the website wrote that the Mana Company Black Teas have high calcium content which is useful for people who suffer from Osteoporosis. Without a doubt, this news has spread in the whole of world; therefore, people who have Osteoporosis can use this tea. As you can see, governments try to announce the best products which people can use them without worry.
Secondly, governments pay money to big companies to advertise healthy foods. Moreover, some governments ask companies to sell their products at a low price because in this way even poor people can eat healthy foods. Actually, the government invests in people's health; because this work has a positive feedback for the government, but there is a big problem and that is it people disregard the advertisements and consume foods without paying attention to the government warnings. Consequently, people get various diseases which most of them are related to their diet. This strategy shows that governments attempt to reveal all facts about foods, but we should know that sometimes people do not like pay attention to their advice.
In the end, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that the governments use all of their powers to help people live a healthy life and for getting the best result people have to listen to their guidance.
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in big city .Do you agree or disagree ? 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific solutions presented reading passage. why prevent declining trees? 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. humpback whales navigation by stars 80
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. The cane toads population 83
- The burning mirror in ancient time 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03664921466 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68892898393 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6448489077 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296983919826 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993931040211 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681346847492 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185297408247 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815253641247 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.