endotherms

Essay topics:

endotherms

The reading and lecture are both about whether dinosaurs are endotherms or not. The reading passage stated three possible claims to support this theory. The lecturer challenged all these claims. He says that they are all faulty.

To begin with, the author of the passage claims that dinosaurs are endotherms due to the discovery of their fossils in the polar region. The article mentions that only special animals with the ability to adapt to such surrounding temperature could survive in that region. The lecturer challenges this specific argument. He says that dinosaurs could have lived in much warmer temperature and subsequently adapted to fluctuating temperature as month changes. In addition, he says that the dinosaurs could have even migrated or hibernated when the surrounding temperature grew severe.

Secondly, the writer suggests that due to the presence of dinosaurs leg under there body, they are endotherms as seen in other animals that are endotherms. In contrast, the lecturer claims that the presence of dinosaur’s leg under their body is to support weight and as such they can grow bigger without any challenge. He elaborated that they can grow to a very high size.

In conclusion, the author of the passage posits that the nerve and blood vessels in dinosaurs are also found in living animals is a reason why they could be regarded as endotherms. Whereas, the lecturer refutes this claim by stating that this vessels allow them to grow at a slow rate during very cold temperature and then grow again after the surrounding temperature become more favourable.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-16 Barry Shi 70 view
2023-11-14 TiOluwani97 80 view
2023-07-20 guna 73 view
2023-07-15 nusybah 85 view
2023-07-15 M. MEHRABI KERMANI 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user salamikehinde :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...possible claims to support this theory. The lecturer challenged all these claims. H...
^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...urer refutes this claim by stating that this vessels allow them to grow at a slow ra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17441860465 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71714272932 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1355009897 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3571428571 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10458379266 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462645477055 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897834606555 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719883297279 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456904786198 0.0443174109184 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.