The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend?

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend?

On the other hand , having a cell phone will tempt people to spend all day talking or texting, instead of doing anything productive. Studies have proven that teens who spend too much of their time with their cell phones are more prone to stress and fatigue. It can also lead to psychological disorders in some cases. Additionally, most of the teens keep their cell phones nearby while sleeping to respond to texts and calls. They feel pressurized to remain reachable around the clock. It leads to sleep interruption and disruption. Teens also become irritable when they are sleep deprived.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 dildora14 61 view
2019-12-27 dildora14 11 view
2019-12-27 AzizbekYuldahsev 78 view
2019-06-30 gizem33 78 view
2019-06-22 mms007 67 view
Essays by user dildora14 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
On the other hand , having a cell phone will tempt people t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 41.998997996 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 502.0 1615.20841683 31% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 97.0 315.596192385 31% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17525773196 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.13828899271 4.20363070211 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93905894325 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 176.041082164 42% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.762886597938 0.561755894193 136% => OK
syllable_count: 144.0 506.74238477 28% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4631167985 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7142857143 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8571428571 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0401243840255 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149473508312 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0175349270928 0.0667982634062 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401243840255 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 78.4519038076 27% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.