Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Due to the prevalence of technology in the automotive sector, the experts expect that in the years to come the vehicles are going to navigate by the computer system. This essay will consider the reason for the statement and provides the disadvantages of this development.
The automotive companies such as Ford and BMW use plenty of financial funding and human resources to invent a new self-driving car system as they convince that the autonomous vehicle can cut of the traffic collision causing by human-error. As a result, if the driverless car is fully developed, the road casualty would be reduced significantly.
However, there are several distinct disadvantages will lead by the invention of robotic vehicles. First and foremost, the robotic car will reduce a large number of job opportunities in the world. The workers such as taxi driver or personal driver are going to lose their source of income and this would lead to another gravest problems such as increasing the unemployment rate and decreasing the status of the people well-being. Secondly, many people might lose their privacy due to somebody can hijack their vehicles, and this will result in the invasion of personal space and inconvenient experience. Lastly, as an automotive product operating by the computer, this type of vehicle might require the owner who well-inform in terms of the technology and computer. This car will unfit to use by the people who ill-inform of the technology.
In conclusion, the driverless car might become true in the future as the automotive industry put a lot of effort to develop the computer-operated vehicles, and several issues such as increasing the unemployment rate and losing economic opportunity may occur.
- People Participate in IELTS Program in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some peope think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent else whereTo what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- the bar chart below shows the number of research students studying a different subject in 2005. 84
- People participate in 6 difference English Course in pare, 2016 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d foremost, the robotic car will reduce a large number of job opportunities in the world. The wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23741007194 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03440240417 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1171912963 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.363636364 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928368213835 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040699011624 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327226024168 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556788965407 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192342880438 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.