TPO 38
The topic of both the passage and the lecture is about a microscopic fungus named Phytophthora, which has been found in the western united states and has made significant damages for the oak trees. The reading mentions three possible ways regarding protecting forests from the dangers of this fungus. The lecture, however, refutes all these methods successively, states her idea about each one of them.
First, the author asserts that one method for this protection is to stop spreading Phytophthora through the forest. The writer claims that since many of this kind of fungus can be observed along hiking or biking trails, it would be possible to avoid their spreading by encouraging hikers to wash their shoes or to ask them install new bike scrubbers. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this idea, says although it seems effective, a considerable impact would not be excepted by using this method. Hence, she refuses this method categorically.
Secondly, the reading suggests that by using a kind of chemical (Fungicidal), oak trees could be [rotected from the mentioned danger. On the contrary, the professor denies this theory like the previous one, claims that due to the large number of trees in forest, it needs both a lot of money and time to implement this method on the whole trees in the forest. As a result, in her opinion, this method would not be possible.
Finally, the writer points out that there is another method for protecting the trees titled "clear-cutting," in which by cutting and burning diseased oaks and seemingly healthy vegetarian surrounding the oaks as well, the other trees could be suffered from being dirty injured by Phytophthora. The professor makes a rebuttal to this idea. She believes that a wide range of vegetarian covering around oak trees are scarce, and cutting and burning this cover would lead to their extinction, and their regeneration would take a long time to happen again.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Universities should spend more money on facilities (such as computer labs and technology in general) rather than on hiring some famous professors. 68
- TPO 38 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...orests from the dangers of this fungus. The lecture, however, refutes all these met...
^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...chemical Fungicidal, oak trees could be [rotected from the mentioned danger. On t...
^
Line 13, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing the trees titled 'clear-cutting,' in which by cutting and burning diseas...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, kind of, as a result, on the contrary, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10903426791 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86529856224 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.582862745 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.