More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Today’s children are spending too much time on using the technological devices. Many parents think that children should be allowed to play on computer, smart phones, and tablet is because that this is beneficial for the children to improve their technology skills. This essay will discuss why this idea has more downside effects on children then its benefits.
The primary argument supporting this idea is that people think that the technology skills are important for their children’s future. In this era, the world is becoming more to rely on the technology. Countries and individuals are maintaining their existence because of the technological developments. The result of this is that people think these skills offer their children to find a job more easily in the future.
However, it must be said that there are several harmful effects on the development of children. The major one is that lack of social skills may develop in children. They are spending more time online communication than that in person. This is because, they cannot make friends in the real life and even they cannot continue the friendships that already have. Secondly, this lifestyle may cause the children to be depressed and alienated because of lack of real relationships in the real world. The result of this might be that increasing of committing suicide among children, and even growth in the crime rates in many countries. Another one, these children are not aware of the real life and the responsibilities they have. They think that life is easy to live, and they will always maintain their life as in their children times.
In conclusion, using of technological devices among children has benefits for their future life, however, I think that this approach can be much more harmful for the children and has more disadvantages than its advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | OezenEC | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | OezenEC | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | laflordestambul | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | laflordestambul | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Allen_1237 | 61 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both t 56
- Some people think that countries should limit the amount of food that they import and mainly eat products from their own country.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 63
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings?Should history stand in the way of progress? 56
- Some people believe that having access to the internet is necessary to live a full life today.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24503311258 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80386159437 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473509933775 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9122059262 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461339020083 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154724184035 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875702875026 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308403276199 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062344599462 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.