It is inevitable that people nowaday eat more and more fast food that cause many diseases. There are many way to decrease the amount of fast food consumer. For me, governments should tax this kind of food a higher excise.
Personally, I thinks it is really reasonable to impose tax on fast food so as to deter companies that produce and sell this junk food to other people. It can limit the amount of fast food sold out in the market. It means that when the products of those companies are taxed, they must set higher prices for their products, so consumers have to pay a higher cost to buy fast food. It is impossible to happen since they don’t want to waste money absurdly. Let’s try putting yourself in that situation, you never want to buy that food with a higher cost than usual no matter how you like to eat them. In short, in my view, this is the most effective method to curb the comsumption of fast food.
Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also agree that the tax collected should be donated to health protection funds and found organizations which propagate and disseminate knowledge about fast food and its harm to everyone. Particular, those organisations take responsibility for learn knowledge about this kind of food and disseminate it to people through various mass medias such as television, radio or newspaper, and it aim to make people aware of unpredictable harm of this junk food and prevent it. For example, some fast food companies even print the warning about the harm on package of products to impact strongly on psychology of consumers and make them consider when they making a purchase.
To conclude, I think that it is completely required of governments to levy a tariff on fastfood if they want to improve peoples’ health because it impact on both producers and consumers. However the most important thing is awareness of consumer. But for their consciousness, high tax makes no sense.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK. 73
- With all the troubles in the world today money spent on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004/2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun way seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ways'.
Suggestion: many ways
...ood that cause many diseases. There are many way to decrease the amount of fast food con...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...of food a higher excise. Personally, I thinks it is really reasonable to impose tax o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...y reasonable to impose tax on fast food so as to deter companies that produce and sell t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to pay a higher cost to buy fast food. It is impossible to happen since they don&...
^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'aims'?
Suggestion: aims
... television, radio or newspaper, and it aim to make people aware of unpredictable h...
^^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...improve peoples' health because it impact on both producers and consumers. Howeve...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...impact on both producers and consumers. However the most important thing is awareness o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, apart from, as to, for example, i think, in short, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 5.60731707317 749% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 336.0 196.424390244 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81547619048 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72958693602 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5790022284 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318961807248 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109781405592 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669650644183 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193538968151 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715671076141 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.