It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary life, furnishing a large number of millennial with tertiary education has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend triggers some detrimental implications, its benefits will be far more significant.

There are a variety of compelling reasons why offering a high proportion of teenagers opportunities to approach higher education system is of a dazzling advantage. First, since university is regarded as an academic learning environment, seniors are liable to enrich their specialized knowledge. In fact, some complex jobs require a deeper understanding about the fundamental theories and the nature of subjects. Therefore, the more likely teenagers are to step into universities, the higher chances they have for decent jobs and handsome salaries. Second, by taking part in university life, youngsters are able to boost their skills such as problem-solving, discussion, and teamwork.This means that their soft skills such as like communicative, and logical skills are also significantly enhanced at the same time, which paves the way for them in workplace later on.

That something is welcomed is reinforced by more supporting evidences below. Third, in order to heighten people's intellect, it is better off for more and more young people to be able to get into university once in their lifetime. Governments should adopt such holistic approaches to tackle the high unemployment rates. For example, American local authorities are inclined to offer more scholarships for international students and widen the scope of studying abroad, which helps the students get exposed to a better education system. Last but not least, it is of paramount importance for young people to improve their social circles with teachers and friends. By doing so, they are inclined to avoid being isolated, which in turn helps them build up a diverse job network.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it makes more sense of for governments of every country to encourage millennial to maintain their learning path to university, for the reasons provide above. Only when concerted endeavors are made by governments in terms making use of the power of education can the prospect of a civilized society be visible.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-05 Khue 84 view
2020-01-05 Khue 89 view
2019-10-27 Thao Phan Phuong 73 view
2019-07-25 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung 56 view
2019-07-12 UYVO 84 view
Essays by user Khue :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In contemporary life, furnishing a large number of millennial with tertiary education has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... offering a high proportion of teenagers opportunities to approach higher educati...
^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...oblem-solving, discussion, and teamwork.This means that their soft skills such as li...
^^^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter off for more and more young people to be able to get into university once i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43839541547 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06696015822 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616045845272 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5736822592 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166011062334 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482032418301 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437500303181 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883184487552 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544453753078 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.