Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Diversity active our brain and also by being unaware of some new tasks produce some hormones to make us excited. Some people like to run away from repetitive tasks and believe they are very boring. In opposit, some take the opposite view and asserts it needs more energy, and they do not want to spend lots of energy and time on their career. From my perspective, various tasks ake them blissful and more eager to about their responsibility. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my idea cogently.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that when individuals do work frequently, their brain becomes exhausted and it changed to the automatic work that their brain orders to do. To clarify it more, when we read a newspaper every day are brain used to this action so no changes will not happen in the secretion of hormone level to show a specific reaction to this act. Consequently, they feel bored and enervating.
A second noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that diversity helps them to improve their creativity, as their brain challenges every day with a new task, they learned how to come up with the new problems. As a result, if a person did not encounter different tasks, he/she would not have been able to detect any solutions in hardship. To take the personal experience as an example, my father as a doctor every day visits a new patient and it happened many times in the surgery, he experienced a new challenge, but her mind learned how to get along with this condition.
Finally, it is indisputable, how much the career has more different tasks, workers are more enthusiastic about it. Since their mind is more actively to work and they do not have time to think of other problems. The results revealed people who have various types of tasks are 67% more satisfied and happier in their life.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the advantages of this kind of work outweigh the disadvantage. Highly recommended that authorities by considering reasonable decisions help to develop this type of job.
- TPO 25 integrated writing 81
- TPO 50 integrated writing 3
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. 3
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
... automatic work that their brain orders to do. To clarify it more, when we read a ne...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uently, they feel bored and enervating. A second noteworthy point in corroborati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, thus, in brief, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81058495822 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75550125108 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565459610028 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0758856384 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26223862453 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802030677278 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422647103531 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137097940869 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603605335774 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.