Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Making mistakes in speech is an unavoidable occurrence that may happen in every speech and every time. The important aspect is how we face it and show a reaction to this event. Among the options that are everyone depends on his/her preference will choose one way. I strongly prefer to wait until the end of the meeting or class and then talk about the errors in speaking. In the following, I will cogently elaborate on my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that waiting shows our respect to the speaker. I firmly believe interrupting someone during the speech shows our rude behavior, because it might happen for everyone. Besides, the speaker perhaps feels embarrassing in front of the great abundance of the audience. To clarify this point of view more, for example in the academician speech which holds in the big halls with lots of audiences from different universities of the world undoubtedly interrupting the speaker disturb the discipline of the conference.
Another noteworthy point in corroborating this issue involves forgetness. The speaker misses his/her balance and the train of the thoughts will be broken. Hence it has a very terrible effect on the quality of the conference or the meeting. According to the study conducted in this issue, it proved to wait until the end of the speech not only helps the speaker but also provides a better situation for the audience to listen carefully. However, some prefer not to say any things, I strongly disagree with this opinion. The speaker never understands his/her mistakes so continues to do it, and in some conditions, it tarnishes his reputation. Psychologists firmly believe that if we did not warn our mistakes to each other after some tears it would be changed to part of our habits and became inveterate in our behaviors.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that it is greatly reasonable we consider the balance behavior to help the speakers and also the discipline of our meeting.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry, unusable desert land. There are many proposals about how to stop this process, known as desertification. A number of proposals in 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 22 integrated writing 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e train of the thoughts will be broken. Hence it has a very terrible effect on the qu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95562130178 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78961294954 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.99352018 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5294117647 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997176044427 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301479896581 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380393487147 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554743599185 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239410830329 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.