The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999)
The bar chart illustrates the European workers in the United states in the year of 1999.
Overall,the least number of employees who came to America from France arrange about four and half thousand people. In the top of European employees is British people who had been worked in United states in 1999 this amount arranged approximately 26 hundred workers.
The average part of all workers in America is 25 thousand people make up the rest of the country which is quite a large number of people working in 1999. In the second place of employment is Germans which in total becomes 25 thousand people. In contrast, visitors from France who are looked to find a job did not make even 7000 workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Heyps | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | Heyps | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | Heyps | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | PennybooomC4 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future It it good for us to rely so much on computers 67
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years. 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 73
- Characteristics of large and small families 50
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ed states in the year of 1999. Overall,the least number of employees who came to A...
^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... the rest of the country which is quite a large number of people working in 1999. In the second p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, in contrast, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 576.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 122.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72131147541 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4341916319 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 173.7 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7528777287 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28034426611 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141026364245 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136601612069 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235939131594 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141026124975 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.