The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.
The given pie charts illustrate how governments in Italy ann Spain spent money in the year of 1990.
It is noticeable that both countries used most of their money for Educational purpose but little money was spent for the environment and other services.
Higher education made up 35% of the amount of money spent by the Italian government in 1990. Whereas in Spain, the number was 10 percent higher (45%). On the other hand, K-12 cost the Italian government more than in Spain (25% and 20%)
Healthcare services cost 14% of the amount of spending in Italy and nearly one-fifth of that in Spain. Both countries spent very little on environmental services, merely 4 to 5 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 56
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program. 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 566.0 965.302439024 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 117.0 196.424390244 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83760683761 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.28886816799 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58989872882 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623931623932 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 161.1 283.868780488 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6072365828 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247314734363 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122448453556 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116654471938 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159099133073 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112899666498 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.