The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided three pie charts represent an overview of average percentages of Sodium, Saturated fats and Added Sugars consumed in the four different meals in the USA.
Overall, the highest percentages of sodium and saturated fats used in the dinner, while the greatest sugar added in the snacks. In addition, the lowest amount of all three types of nutrients used in the breakfast.
In dinner, a significant amount of sodium and saturated fats were consumed by Americans and it was 43% and 37% respectively. However, sugar was used by 23%. In contrast, the lowest percentages of all three nutrients consumed in breakfast and it was 14%, 16% and 16% in sodium, saturated fats and added sugar respectively.
Furthermore, Americans consumed the vast percentage of sugar in snack’s meal and there was 42%; Whereas, 14% of sodium and 21% of saturated fats used in snacks. Meanwhile, in the meal of lunch, sodium, saturated fats and added sugar consumed by 29%, 26% and 19% respectively.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 64
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- Write about the following topic.It has been argued that gift giving should not be encouraged, because money is often wasted on things that people do not like or want.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?Give reasons for your answer and includ 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Take a look at the graphic and complete the task.The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09202453988 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88403596412 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429447852761 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7207044774 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846880519363 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490527002391 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425766954017 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719002400894 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329344201141 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.