Do you think people in the past are more friendly than they are today?
Whether people in the past are more friendly than they are today or not is widely discussed. Many people feel that people in the past are more nicely. However, a trend that has existed for many years is that people are willing to help someone. And I strongly believe that people today are more friendly than in the past for the following reason.
First of all, technology is different than in the past. To be concise, with technology, people can help other in various manners. Even if we do not know answers exactly, we still can search answers though the internet. Take my experience for example, I traveled to Seoul last year, I wanted to find a famous cheese cake store but google map for Korea was not detailed enough. So I asked a Korean student for help, she did not familiar with that area, but she use her cellphone and open the Naver map, accurate Korean map, to search the store for me.
Secondly, with the globalization, people’s level on language is better than in the past. In other words, people can communicate in simple English and body language, so they are not afraid to help foreigners. To demonstrate, Taiwan was picked for loved country Top one in famous travel magazine. The reason was that Taiwanese people usually can speak English, so traveler can get a lot of helps.
Of course, some people may disagree with my position in this matter. They may think that I am wrong. However, I think that my viewpoint are strong enough to support my idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | Fifi13 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | yaya04 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | Mahshid_lip | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Karicaia | 76 | view |
- In order to attract more tourists government should improve the safety by hiring more police or improve the appearance by improving the old buildings and streets 78
- One of the most challenge problems in modern society is to have the most up-to-date skills for workplace. For solving this problem, the government decides to give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to learn new skills. Do you think it is an e 76
- Imagine that your city government has given permission for a major company to build a large factory near your neighborhood Do you think this is a good idea Why or why not Explain your position using specific reasons and examples 70
- There are many news stories about a current event that helps people take a break from reading or listening to the news for a few days or weeks It is beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks Do you agree or disagree with 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... First of all, technology is different than in the past. To be concise, with techno...
^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...id not familiar with that area, but she use her cellphone and open the Naver map, a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, of course, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6641221374 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42780496181 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5938488029 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.375 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344893784915 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131943154989 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150743658166 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204742789232 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167939090984 0.0645574589148 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.