same food
The importance of such as eating the same food which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly people focus fast food. Consequently, fast food is very bad for people health because increase the diseases. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that people daily routine such as eating the fruit because fruit provide the energy and best of the health. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is fast food no eating is daily. Besides, fast food only one day in one week because not daily eating do. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the fast food are indeed too great to ignore.
- Whether design of building have a opposite effect on industry and society? 55
- credit cards 85
- Playing games is fun only when you win. do you agree or disagree with the statement. 77
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Write its pros and cons? 77
- whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97899159664 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51980363369 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2710755808 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180018085447 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620202001397 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689719113365 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104924656482 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146496961973 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.