Whether formal writing examination is a good way to assess students learning?
Recently, the phenomenon of formal writing examination and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of assessing students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that brilliant means can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal writing examination can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as learning students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of assessing assignments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of an excellent way are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, formal writing examination can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of irresponsible students are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient learning. Hence, predicted outcomes of atrocious approaches are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of formal writing examination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of assessing student's works prove the significance of an acceptable way, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-26 | Daniel Torres | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | mndpsngh21 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | mndpsngh21 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Ramanpreetsingh | 55 | view |
- When you look for a job, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one do you agree with? 80
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles. What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples. 88
- Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it's actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications. 85
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85779816514 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2865171817 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660550458716 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9291453199 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315400303688 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940152567901 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717190686237 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177328716243 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405406013886 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.