Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or curse?
Recently the phenomenon of increasing life expectancy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of medical technologies are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a healthy life can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing life expectancy can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient medicine, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of brilliant life expectancy, Hence, beneficial ramifications of an excellent blessing are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, increased life expectancy can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of costly medical technologies are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described an inefficient technology. Thus, predicted outcomes of an atrocious crus are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing life expectancy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient medical technologies prove the significance of a healthy lifestyle, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81333333333 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33695802924 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635555555556 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8469849617 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.8 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324647945203 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103875034645 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672530118516 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178515990702 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231210795927 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.