The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the number of tourism-related jobs of a British city in a 21-year period, starting from 1989.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that jobs in restaurants and hotels were most favored in tourism industries. Meanwhile, the opposite is true for the others in the same interval of time.
More specifically, the figures of hotel services and tourists traveling reached their highest points at 1400 and 1050 jobs in 1994 respectively. But these number soon dropped gradually and stopped at 1050 jobs for hotel services and 450 jobs for tourists traveling. Jobs in restaurants, however, were always the most necessary work needed in tourism industries and witnessed highest figures throughout the period, with a notable exception to be second rank behind hotel works in 1994. Restaurant works, therefore, reached its peak at slightly over 1600 jobs which was approximately two-fold larger than that of sport and leisure activities in 2004. These figures for restaurant jobs as well as sport events experienced a decrease with a difference of roughly 300 jobs for each one in 2009.
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
- US government expenditure on research 78
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 84
- The graphs show below the post school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... roughly 300 jobs for each one in 2009.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15425531915 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82379685096 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8712869467 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143764665294 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635655419569 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497363027439 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106300983123 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510090948807 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.