the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000. summarize the information by selecting, reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides data about how much income that romance films, comedies and action/horror films made for a studio in Hollywood between 1970 and 2000. In general, the percentages of the romance films declined significantly, and the figure for comedies remained quite stable. Simultaneously, although the action/ horror movies witnessed a tremendous increase, this genre started at the lowest contributor before becoming the highest at the end of the period.
As the graph shown, in 1970, the proportion of revenue generated by romance films was over 50%, which was the highest data. Then, the figure for the romance started to drop slightly too nearly 40% in 1980 before a dramatic decrease to the lowest figure in 2000, which was less than 10%. As regard to comedies, the percentage incomes increase slightly from about 33% approximately 35% in the first ten years. However, the figures for this genre soon decreased gradually and finally stood at 30% in 2000.
In contrary, action/ horror films accounted for less than 10% of the revenue at the start of the period, but their contribution increased steadily at approximately 15% and nearly 20% in 1980 and 1990, respectively. Subsequently, the figure soared to nearly 40% in 2000, making this genre the greatest source of revenue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn | 84 | view |
- people think children should have a pet to take care while other disagree Discuss both views and give opinions 89
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000. summarize the information by selecting, reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below shows information on people from each household type who lived in poverty in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased gradually and finally stood at 30% in 2000. In contrary, action/ horror f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17142857143 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7856166039 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8765039451 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240871729782 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102954827255 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645248508372 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16998170017 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461803977262 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.