The table below shows information on people from each household type who lived in poverty in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features

Essay topics:

The table below shows information on people from each household type who lived in poverty in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features

The graph indicates the amount of poor people in various household categories by the year 2000. Overall, it can be seen that though the proportion in terms of married occupants with offsprings not as high as sole parents, the actual number of that was the most contribution to the sum.
Regarding the total figure, there were 1,837,000 people living in poverty from all types of households, which accounted for 11%. The elderly either being single or having a partner experienced the lowest proportions of all six categories at 60% and 4% (or 54000 and 48000 people), respectively. The spouses who had no children witnessed a one third less than which is the group having one , nevertheless, the number of the poor in these were slightly identical, at roughly 200 000 people.
According to the table, single occupants living in poverty saw a significant percentage, approximately one fifth 359 000 people. Finally the most people living with both spouse and offsprings under financial difficulty at 933 000 , whereas, the proportion of which only accounted for go 12%

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... less than which is the group having one , nevertheless, the number of the poor in...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...approximately one fifth 359 000 people. Finally the most people living with both spouse...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gs under financial difficulty at 933 000 , whereas, the proportion of which only a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83825206572 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653409090909 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0497460548 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112512802364 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575973574933 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547602117181 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739354985835 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00765838369481 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.