The information provided in the line chart illustrate average number of carbon dioxide emissions per person in five different countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while the UK had the highest average carbon dioxide emission per person over the period shown, average carbon dioxide per person in Portugal and Sweden had the lowest metric tons(mt) even though they started to increase year by year.
According to the data, average carbon dioxide per person for Portugal stood at about 3 mt. This number increased gradually and reached to 5 mt. in 2007. Another noticeable increase can be seen for Italy. Average carbon dioxide emission per person increased from 5 mt to 7 mt in 1967 and 2007, respectively.
Looking at the countries who experienced decrease in their average carbon dioxide emissions per person in more detail, it can be seen that Sweden stood at 7 mt in 1967. This number kept increasing to 11 mt. until 1977. Then, it started fall slightly to 7 mt. and 6 mt.in 1987 and 1997, respectively. Finally, Sweden had its lowest decrease in 2007 at 5 mt. Another country which experience decrease in carbon emission per person was the United Kingdom. It stood at 11 mt. which was the highest average number compared to other countries in 1967. This number had a noticeable decrease to 7 mt. in 2007. Even though, the UK experience its lowest number in average carbon dioxide emissions per person, its number was still the highest compared to other countries in 2007.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 56
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89641434263 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5274543689 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418326693227 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.5580727434 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8125 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262522226917 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960467018145 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939919887088 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213650406276 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317086850467 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.