The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The information provided in the pie charts illustrate amount of electricity which was generated from all sources and renewables in germany and france in 2009.
Overall, france produced its electricity more from nuclear, whereas conventional thermal was used more in germany in 2009. While germany had 560 Billion kWh, france had 510% billion kWh.
Looking at the data in more detail, germany produced more electricity from conventional thermal at 59,6%. it was followed by nuclear, renewables at 23.0%, respectively. Within the renewables, wind had the biggest rate at 36.9%.
When it comes to france's generation, nuclear is the highest source that they used at 76.0% in 2009. renewable and conventional sources had a small effect at 13.7%, 10.3%, respectively.In the renewables, Hydro electric was used most at 80.5%. 10.5 percentage of people generated their electricity from wind. Biomas had only 8.1%.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re in germany in 2009. While germany had 560 Billion kWh, france had 510% billion...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ity from conventional thermal at 59,6%. it was followed by nuclear, renewables at ...
^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Renewable
...source that they used at 76.0% in 2009. renewable and conventional sources had a small ef...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ll effect at 13.7%, 10.3%, respectively.In the renewables, Hydro electric was used...
^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...renewables, Hydro electric was used most at 80.5%. 10.5 percentage of people gene...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48936170213 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91724810433 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9234726163 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244227639594 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113771662085 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125482535736 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197299676697 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144061366987 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.