The bar chart compares and contrast data on the changes in the numerical value of males and females in higher education in the UK over 21 years from 1970 to 1991.
Overall, the trend of full-time education seem to rise for both the genders, but the Part-time education in males shows a downfall and a gradual rise in females.
Firstly, the trend of Full-time education, In men there is a constant increase in the number, which approximately reaches to 200 thousand by 1990/91, whereas in women there is a drastic increase in first ten years. It is clear that in 1970/71 students were a few 100 thousand, and in 1980/81 they reached to near 200 thousand, but in next Ten years it showed a slight change in number.
Secondly, the movement in Part-time Education, The Females showed a steady increase in the whole period. Were in 1970/71 they were below 800 thousand students, in 1990/91 they crossed 1000 thousand. However, the opposite trend was visible in males. The males were 1000 thousand in 1970/71, then they fell to a number near to 800 thousand in 1980/81 and again show a slight rise in 1990/91. Hence, showing a fluctuating trend.
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 78
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countriesbetween 1990 and 1999
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 73
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76381909548 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55263522012 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.952360689 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362897997357 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138549185446 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776197404525 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199226667122 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864187429773 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.