The table below shows the weight of people in a particular country from 1999 to 2009.
The table compares the percentage of males and females about body condition in a particular nation between 1999 and 2009.
Generally, the proportion of the person having a normal weight was the largest in both genders during the research period. In addition, the overweight group of women increased, the opposite was true for men.
As can be seen from the table, in 1999, 49% of girls had a normal weight, while the figure for those who were underweight stood at about half of that percent. A similar pattern was seen in boys but the figures were smaller, at 41% and 22% respectively. The number of gentlemen owning the weight exceeding allowed was 30%, compared to 18% of lady.
Over the following five years, three weigh groups of women experienced an upward trend, while that only happened in average weigh of men. Details, the rates of standard weight males and females both rose in 2004, to 51% and 48%, respectively. The amount of fat girls also increased slightly to 21%, while the figure for boys fell sharply by 7% to 23% in 2004. Similarly, underweight females and their counterparts went through the same thing, at 29% and 20% sequentially. Over the five years ensuing, the proportion of standard weight and overweight of both genders decreased to 47% and 19% respectively in 2009. However, the percentage of underweight lady went down to 28%, while the data for gentlemen went up to 23% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Thu Thuy_02 | view | |
| 2022-12-01 | lucluc | view | |
| 2022-06-16 | nttn24905_vkdekutsuki | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | adamneyul | 75 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 84
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 62
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 78
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 89
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8305785124 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63939629714 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.6092953678 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144254159291 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502879976019 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615075502643 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100883198399 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694135368926 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.