Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
It has long been a subject of discussion on whether experimental learning can work well in formal education and experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad arguments are in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% of people benefit from the above-mentioned notion, whereas 30% of people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above sentence.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% of citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved they're existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly outweigh drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say that experimental learning can work well in formal education and experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 76 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | manraj123 | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 45 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | ameliale92 | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-02 | belinapupa | 93 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% of people benef...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit from the above-mentioned notion, whereas 30% of people face disadvantages...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...posed government reforms. They improved theyre existing scenario tremendously and that...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09019607843 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87236096554 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5515484391 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248900467817 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954010726358 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184649236161 0.071462118173 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181369411701 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163760721351 0.0609392437508 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.