Some people think that space research is waste of money.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?
In modern times, more and more technologies are invented and even astronauts launched satellites on the Mars. However, some commentators claim that research in the field of space is waste of money. If question, I agree to a large extent with mentioned comment. My inclinations are elaborated further.
There are wide range of reasons for my support to this statement the foremost wall is that there are many e areas in the society, which needs an improvement, such as Transportation, Hospital services, Education, Housing services etc. To explain it, instead of wasting money in space research, this look after primary services. This is because they need to fulfill the daily requirements of general public, several individuals does not have a home on the earth. Even, middle-class families cannot afford some of Medical Services.
A further point in supporting this is that if space research program will fail, it will cost a huge amount of money to the government and all this money is collected as a text from citizens. A good illustration of this is the failure of ISRO. ISRO is Indian Space Research Organisation, which was failed to connect their satellite on the Mars. On that project they lost their 53000 crore rupees. If Indian officials allowed this money for public welfare, it could made many changes in the lifestyle of Indian public.
Despite all these, there is also case for the idea that resources are worth investment in space. Firstly, we need substitute of Earth, as the population is increasing rapidly. There is a sort of space in many areas of the world. In addition, energy resources are very limited. Hence, we need to explore it from another planets and it will also create employment for astronauts.
Thus to conclude, it must be said that space research fundings has become a complex issue. I would agree with the opinion because first duty of authorities is to look after their general public and then other things. If they take care of their already constructed services, they can gain popularity in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this thr case What can be done about this problem 61
- Some people think that space research is waste of money To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- There are many things that motivate a person to work but money is the most compelling In your opinion how influential is the power of money 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ed to fulfill the daily requirements of general public, several individuals does not have a ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...this money for public welfare, it could made many changes in the lifestyle of Indian...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o create employment for astronauts. Thus to conclude, it must be said that space...
^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y of authorities is to look after their general public and then other things. If they take car...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, then, thus, in addition, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98833819242 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71956190695 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1276450427 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4761904762 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252504898176 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672852833421 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757848542367 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129884202179 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618122685643 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.