The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets.
The charts given below illustrates the information on the proportion of carbohydrates, fat and protein in three different diets, data is measured in percentage. All in all it clearly seen that both of healthy diet and healthy diet for sport was similar highest percentage of all categories which was carbohydrates while Average diet was equal proportion with protein.
Base on healthy diet chart and healthy diet sports chart, it is notable that carbohydrates was similar percentage. Representing 50%. Difference protein was the second highest proportion of two different by 5%. While both healthy diets and healthy diets for sports was similar lowest segments of three categories was fat 20% at healthy diet and 15% at healthy diet for sport.
In average diet, between carbohydrates and protein was equal percentage. It got 40% and both of carbohydrates and protein was also the biggest proportion of average diets. While, the smallest contribution was fat. Occupied 20% of all categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | nguyenvietvankhoa | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | linhdan0112 | 30 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | linhdan0112 | 10 | view |
| 2021-06-09 | Nguyen Bich Chau | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all source and renewables in the year 2009 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 63
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 70
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...categories which was carbohydrates while Average diet was equal proportion with p...
^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he biggest proportion of average diets. While, the smallest contribution was fat. Occ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32484076433 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98289170209 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477707006369 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.0124153822 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325158189572 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146749291132 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107738891701 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258190130798 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614824125112 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.