The importance of cards such as debit and credit card is always a debatable topic. Even though many people claim that card less society is better for everyone, however, others reject this notion and argued that it leads to negative development in the society. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both positive and negative side of card less society and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons that further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems to the fact that there is a possibility to do shopping everywhere such as in developed countries as well as rural area. Moreover, in rural areas people are less educated and they have minimum knowledge of technology so the card less society is more beneficial for them.
However, there are pitfalls that negate with this argument and that can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of card less society, but the most alarming one is rooted to the fact that government easily catch the person with the black money. For instance, the research in USA shows that if the society is become cashless then it leads to positive development of the country.
According to argument aforementioned, one can reach to the conclusion that card less society has more demerits as compared to merits and it is expected that people take cognizance of this fact and further the government should establish guidelines to educate people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thus lead to a plausible conclusion. There are myriad of reasons that further...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08979591837 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66629665627 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2097303654 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.555555556 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187628978337 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818660571288 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470299203355 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117859702662 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334524299451 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.