People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
These days, the environment problem has drawing public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for means of transportation should be applied or not is a controversial issue. I totally agree with increasing fuel from the government with its many benefits.
There are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that boosting the price of fuel could bring many assets. First and Foremost, the charge of material is grown up which can generate a good opportunity for public transport to turn back and develop more. The reason for that is because public transport is facing the risk of being forgotten and pushed to brink of bankruptcy. Secondly, the increasing cost of fuel that helps people lift out of many accidents because people have to decline considerably the number of journeys, which spurs an inevitable blessing of being limited many unfortunate accidents in the life.
Nevertheless, reducing cars and other vehicles is as another way to address the crippling problem which is air pollution. Firstly, when the residents could minimize materials for their cars or other vehicles in the sense that the congestion could decrease. As a result, it is also the main culprit of promoting the quality of the atmosphere that leads to shaping the healthy life of people. Finally, it is understood that people realize easily the value of the environment. This means that they may provide incentives or organize some events to enhance people’s awareness in guarding the environment.
In conclusion, the government need to implement this method with the objectives which are not only saving the environment but also advancing the good life of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 50
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers Would the advantages of this o 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...t problem has drawing public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for mean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...here are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that boosting the price of fue...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...k and develop more. The reason for that is because public transport is facing the risk of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16788321168 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81307088203 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3837079339 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271501991087 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830373263695 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582735050508 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142944766056 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787502421189 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.