People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
People have differing views with regard to tackling issues about the environment by raising the price of fossil fuel used by cars and other vehicles. While I accept that the aforementioned solution brings several certain benefits, I still believe that there are a variety of other measures which are more effective.
By increasing the fuel’s cost, lots of environmental challenges can be resolved. To commence with, this strategy can help reduce the influx of traffic that is because people tend to use public transports or carpool and share riding. As a result, the carbon dioxide may go down and have a positive impact on the international efforts in tackling Greenhouse effects. In addition, if fossil fuel can be reduced, our natural resources can be prevented from depleting. It would minimize habitat destruction and tackle the pollution that stems from the activities of the fossil fuel extractive industries.
On the other hand, alongside such solutions, the government can take some action to solve the environmental problems in the long term. Initially, the government can provide free buses and train passes that can also encourage people to switch from private vehicles to more sustainable options. Consequently, the overall vehicle emission can be reduced and that can enhance the quality of the atmosphere. Moreover, electric vehicles should be promoted to citizens which use environmentally friendly resources. This can be added to the effort of keeping our surroundings from deteriorating.
In conclusion, although the rise of petrol price would be a helpful environmentally-friendly transport measure, the government should impose some other solutions that would be more effective in the long term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that children should aim to do their best at whatever they are doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can also encourage people to switch from private vehicles to more sustainable opt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4531835206 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15467433338 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0494156651 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206483410207 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757994149702 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643682350184 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119701459771 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267796271286 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.