TPO 21 independent agree or not
for success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Competition in today's working areas are so high that many employees are seeking diverse ways to increase their level of success in their majors. There are mutually exclusive opinions in this context whether having great relations is more beneficial for workers or digesting all major-related contents. In my view, I am inclined to the former idealization in spite of the fact that the latter has more aficionados among adults. My answer to this bone of contention is twofold, and in the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost explanation which is worth mentioning is that with having satisfactory relationships, individuals do not have to learn and know everything about their professions. Furthermore, they can allocate some chores to their colleagues who are better than them in that specific issue. To put it into a more vivid picture, I always thought that working and learning everything by myself is more profitable for me, but after a while, when I realized that I had not made any progress as a civil engineer, I started to make new friends who could help me understand my problems. Behnam who helped me solve a software issue gradually became my best professional participant in my job, and afterwards, we have been working together since ten years ago without feeling the need to study new subjects related to our projects.
The second equally far-reaching rationalization to bear in mind is that with great relations, people will have access to more job opportunities and projects. As elderly people say, fraternizing always opens new doors in your professions. Moreover, researchers conclude that great relations will have been considered as the first critical success factor for knowledge workers by the end of 2050. As an illustration, my cousin was a seasoned web developer, but was not renowned enough to be offered myriad projects. He recognized that his lack of communications had caused this decrease in his job offers. Therefore, he started to attend as many conferences and seminars related to his job as he could to make new relations. Joining great social groups he has been being offered numerous jobs which are improving his prosperity.
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned justifications into account, I comply with this notion that making beneficial relations is more momentous in succeeding in comparison with studying hard. Good colleagues will teach you and omit your faults in your job; also, one can allocate their parts of jobs, which they themselves cannot solve, to their contributors. Additionally, individuals are introduced to scores of companies and be offered a preponderance of job opportunities thanks to their great relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- is it better to get news from sources with similar views to yours or from those with different views from yours 83
- TPO extra 2 independent agree or not a person should never make an important decision alone 93
- one should get news about events from around the world or should not 83
- should governments support internet advancement or public transport 83
- little time spent on play or schoolwork 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...s, individuals do not have to learn and know everything about their professions. Fur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25282167043 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10152756239 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575620767494 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9297506981 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.277777778 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158544150806 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047572135129 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035512584321 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949635644596 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013665687109 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.