Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws, others think laws have little effect. What is your
opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of behavioral laws and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of influencing personal behavior is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that human behavior patterns can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, limiting human behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of acceptable behavior, as well as breaking the law, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between human legislations and a law-abiding citizen. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both behavior management and the effects of laws on behaviors apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, disobeying against the law might increase the consequences of criminal law. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of anti-social behavior could relate to this reality that the demerits of human manners pertain to unlawful activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of normal behavior is correlated negatively with behavioral patterns. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of making laws.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of limiting people's attitudes far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the behavior of human prove the significance of law requirements, but also pinpoint human behaviors implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
2022-11-26 | Resham | 77 | view |
2020-11-13 | yasamin62 | 77 | view |
2020-11-13 | yasamin62 | 77 | view |
2020-09-09 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 78
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- Many people argue that success of people depends on the environments 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68888888889 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25828268198 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8001736108 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32286765095 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112775010342 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762145426756 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191626927622 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634406515639 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.