The three pies chart below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant.
The given pie charts present information about the proportion of total costs in a particular UK school in three separate years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, teachers’salaries constituted the largest percentages of the school budget, while the expenses of insurance remained at the bottom despite seeing the steady growth.
According to the charts, in all three years, the greatest expenditure was on staff wages, starting the period at 40% of total revenue, reaching 50% in 1991 and ending at 45% in 2001. Similarly, the cost of insurance saw a rising trend, with only 2% in 1981 climbing up to 8% in 2001. In contrast, the annual budget for workers payment observed a downward tendency from 28% in 1981 to only 15% in 2001.
The expenditure on study resources such as books witnessed a slight increase of 5%, from 15% of the total spending in 1981 to 20% in 1991 before descending to 9% in 2001. Meanwhile, the cost of furniture and equipment experienced an opposite trend, with 15% in 1981 falling down to only 5% in 1991 and reaching 23% in 2001.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these main causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84065934066 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8320804843 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3872636 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225451696786 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106991975946 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904050321902 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146902505785 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10779385956 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.