The given pie charts illustrate the weekly expenditures of Americans and British people in 2010.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately conspicuous that the amount of money spent on fundamental needs was outstandingly high. On the other hand, weekly DVDs-related payments had the least involvement in the surveyed period.
In England, the highest expense was on accommodation, 30%. Meanwhile, The proportion of money spent on food was 12% lower than that of Rent. Next, Spending on outdoor activities and transportations shared the same proportion, which both made up 15% of the budget of British residents. Lastly, DVDs and Books accounted for 10% and 12%, respectively.
Turning to data from America, fundamental needs constituted the lion's share of the total expense, 45%. In detail, the weekly rental payments accounted for 20% of all American budgets, while the involvement of food supplies was 5% higher. Meanwhile, outdoor and book-related expenditures identically made up 15% of the budget of American residents. Besides, the DVDs-related category was the lowest, at 10%.
- The graphs below show a comparison of the weekly expenses in the UK and the US in 2010 73
- The graphs show a comparison of the expenses in the UK and the US 11
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017 43
- The graphs below show a comparison of the weekly expenses in the UK and the US in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Americans and British people in 2010. Looking at the graph, it is immediately ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs constituted" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'constituting' or 'to be constituted'.
Suggestion: constituting; to be constituted
...to data from America, fundamental needs constituted the lions share of the total expense, 4...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, lastly, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15379028164 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6180316503 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6363636364 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0311321496632 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01390413086 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302234898252 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0193015450046 0.15604864568 12% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197465095067 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.