A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (ages14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:
• Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
• Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using online material that each teacher will study individually.
There is no doubt that nowadays, teachers play the key role in people's lives. No one can deny the direct and indirect effects of teachers. It is a no-brainer that a qulified teacher can discover students'
talents and guide them to climb the ladder of success. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that we should select small groups of accepted teachers, educate them and then ask them to teach other
teachers in their schools. Some others, however may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that we should educate all teachers online independently. From my own perspective, the second belief is true. I hold
this because of two reasons that I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that teaching independently online is more effective. In this way, all teachers have a equal access to original experts. They can
call their question and learn effectively. On the other hand, maybe excelent teachers cannot convey all the concepts to other teachers. It is possible that teachers have a questions and that teachers cannot
answer them. Some people argue that it is better that educated teachers train other teachers because they have rapport bonds with each other, so they can teach effectively. I believe this is not so. Given that they have
a good relationship, because they are not expert in teaching to other teachers, They cannot convey the concepts to them well, which paves the way for misunderstanding.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that teaching online is economical. To teach good teachers, government should provide physicall classes, teachers should trip to the cities that this classes are
executed and so on which is costly, but teaching online do not need any classes or triping. Every teachers can connect online and have communication with experts, so government can save the money. Besides that
because teachers teach online, they can record calsses and watch them again to consolidate their learnings.
To make a long story short, all the aforementioned above lead us to the conclusion that online training has a lot of benefits that outweight the benefits of teaching qualified teachers because of teaching effectiveness
and saving money. It is anticipated that in the not distance future, governments will pay more attention to the online trainings because of it's significant benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-23 | hamedakbarian | 73 | view |
- If the government wants to invest in the following three areas what do you think is the most worthwhile Land exploration Education Health care 82
- Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to succeed at college or university 1 Tutors in university 2 The encouragement from family and friends 3 High quality education from high school 87
- If the government wants to invest in the following three areas what do you think is the most worthwhile Land exploration Education Health care 70
- Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 73
- Which one do you think is the most important for high school teacher age from 15 to 18 The ability to give students advice to plan for their future The ability to find which students need help and provide them with help The ability to encourage students t 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a qulified teacher can discover students talents and guide them to climb the ladd...
^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te them and then ask them to teach other teachers in their schools. Some others, ...
^^^
Line 6, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng essay. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 177, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fective. In this way, all teachers have a equal access to original experts. They ...
^
Line 6, column 177, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'equal access'.
Suggestion: equal access
...fective. In this way, all teachers have a equal access to original experts. They can call the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eve this is not so. Given that they have a good relationship, because they are no...
^^^
Line 11, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trip to the cities that this classes are executed and so on which is costly, but ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2253164557 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74612485705 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513924050633 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7098085299 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.53405017921 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272400871089 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830045181824 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532550593549 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10717939672 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373217895343 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.