Many stores sell organic fruits and vegetables (produced without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides) even though the often cost more than conventional fruits and vegetables.
Why do some people prefer to eat organic food?
Do you think organic food is worth the extra cost?
Recently, the existence of organic fruits and vegetables that have been grown without chemicals are happen in society. Many people prefer to buy organic fruits and vegetables than the conventional one because they like and it is better for their health. It is cost more but I believe it is worth than the higher price.
Currently people choose organic fruits and vegetables for many reasons. For my point of view, the main reason is health. Conventional fruits and vegetables are grown with chemical that are used for fertilized the soil, eradicated the weeds and kill insects. Although, fruits and vegetable that are grown with chemical support look big, clean and fresh when they are in the store, but they are filled with unfriendly material. Maybe people can’t see it, but they are there. People who concerned with bodily health prefer to choose organic food. Even it is cost more, but it is more expensive to be sick.
They though that by eating organic food is as investment for health. As we know, chemical can destroyed bodily health and bring some disease especially with a major diseases like cancer. Free from some disease making us happy and have productive life. So, it is better to do preventive action than to be sick and spent more money for recovery process.
In conclusion why people recently prefer on consuming organic fruits and vegetables is for better health, better life for now and future. Moreover, we do not need to be afraid of our health and save more money for other important things.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-28 | Bonita Melinda Pangaribuan | 56 | view |
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The carts bellow show how the average household budget was pent in two different years 48
- Carbon dioxide emissions produced by five different sectors in United Kingdom in 970 2000 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...t have been grown without chemicals are happen in society. Many people prefer to buy o...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...th. It is cost more but I believe it is worth than the higher price. Currently peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'disease'?
Suggestion: disease
...ng some disease especially with a major diseases like cancer. Free from some disease mak...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86872586873 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38869796509 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53667953668 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0587628046 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8125 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379817570869 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129332574871 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083508998091 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242295339617 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862549994382 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...t have been grown without chemicals are happen in society. Many people prefer to buy o...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...th. It is cost more but I believe it is worth than the higher price. Currently peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'disease'?
Suggestion: disease
...ng some disease especially with a major diseases like cancer. Free from some disease mak...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86872586873 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38869796509 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53667953668 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0587628046 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8125 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379817570869 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129332574871 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083508998091 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242295339617 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862549994382 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.