All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. Employees of an organization are well informed by the issue as they have faced it closely as compared to the outside consultant.
By spending more time with the employees of their own rather than hiring outside consultants, the companies can actually save a lot of money which can be then further invested into different numerous projects for future profits. Recently, I was interning with an oil and gas sector company in India i.e Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Refineries headquarters and I saw the similar approach being taken as the company instead of hiring outside consultants, spent more time discussing the issues amongst themselves. As a result, the company is one of the highest profit making companies in this sector in India.
Sometimes, the companies should rely on their employees rather than taking the issues to outside consultants as the employees at our organization are well known with the working norms of the company and this not only instills an ample amount of confidence in the employees but also enhances the overall productivity of the employees, therefore invigorating the overall environment of the company. It's pretty obvious if we suppose an employee of a company is seeing his ideas are well listened by his boss in the organization will make him work more passionately for his company.
But we can't completely rely on the employees solely for the efficient working of the companies and have to hire outside consultants for the same. Each and everyone in this world has a unique style of working and approaching towards the solution of the issues faced. The consultants at the same time are particularly trained for these purposes to find solutions to the problems whose solution is unthinkable. Rather experience also matters in this profession as the problem faced by one company can be new for it but it might be true that the consultant company would have already found out the solution to the same problem for a different company.
Some of the well known research companies have faced an issue with their information being leaked by some or the other manner. Therefore the outside consultants can't be completely trusted as another rival company can bribe the consultant company to leak one's information, therefore wasting all the money and time invested on the same. Therefore companies should spend more time with the employees of it's own organization rather than hiring the outside consultants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 57
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...assionately for his company. But we cant completely rely on the employees solely...
^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...problems whose solution is unthinkable. Rather experience also matters in this profess...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...me problem for a different company. Some of the well known research companies have face...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ing leaked by some or the other manner. Therefore the outside consultants cant be complet...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nner. Therefore the outside consultants cant be completely trusted as another rival ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...an bribe the consultant company to leak ones information, therefore wasting all the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he money and time invested on the same. Therefore companies should spend more time with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15813953488 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86669391781 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451162790698 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.0685855036 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.866666667 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540836422634 0.243740707755 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222367695629 0.0831039109588 268% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151402053918 0.0758088955206 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35841279756 0.150359130593 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143525839794 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.