The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum:
"Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our students take these classes, they’ll all be able to get high-paying programming jobs and lead fulfilling lives because software engineers and data scientists have the best job prospects and salaries. Therefore, we must educate our students so they can secure these kinds of jobs. Even if they pursue other careers, programming will still benefit them, given that all industries are becoming more technological."
The rampant growth of computers and programming in an unrestrained and untrammelled way has lead to a technological boon for every business man and entrepreneur. The number of ways human beings are dependent on computer is of sheer astonishment. Being a good and proficient progrmmer has become a cardinal part of every job description and therefore, the decision taken by the school is in the right direction with good intentions.
The way computers have engulfed peoples lives right from children learning through apps on their tablets, teenagers indulging in online gaming, graduates learning from online courses and employees working on computers for their livelihood. Everyone has become tech savy. This is really beneficial for all generations of people.
The schools decision is based on facts and is very likely to be proved true. Every engineering domain has a relation with computer programming. The relation may not have become very firm but with technology advancing at rapid rates it is better to be future ready with jobs of the future. This age of internet and millenials consuming abundant amounts of data everyday, the job of a data scientist comes handy, to use that excess data for a good use and serve a better purpose.
Industries are surely becoming more technological but to enforce programming on students for four years to get jobs is certainly disheartening as it snubs the students wish to study, subjects of thier interest. Learning a subject with interest makes a person appreciate the subject while learning a subject just for the selfish reason of a job can never make a person truly happy and excited for that subject. Learning should neer be tantamounted to job salaries and prospects as it deprives the subject of its respect and richness.
Therefore, programming should be given as an elective subject to help cater to the students who are interested in developing the facets of programming while at the same time not dimish any student from exploring myriad number of subjects from other domain. Encouraging a student to pursue what he/she likes helps them gain confidence and live much more freely without any stress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 63 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Shubhan Mital | 38 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | sag15 | 68 | view |
| 2022-05-03 | PraveenaKan | 68 | view |
| 2022-04-02 | jxp018 | 59 | view |
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 76
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- TOEFL integrated writing fuel cell engines 60
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 58
- Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space mo 59
Comments
e-rater score report
Out of topic.
---------------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1775 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.014 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.794 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.953 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.287 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.569 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ials consuming abundant amounts of data everyday, the job of a data scientist comes hand...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, really, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 353.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1388101983 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85728283443 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560906515581 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7473738728 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.933333333 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53333333333 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229192370512 0.218282227539 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709133084186 0.0743258471296 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515058203506 0.0701772020484 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117549415499 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281067008098 0.0628817314937 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.