the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now
The map below illustrates the changes of an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now. It is clear that the structure of the gallery experienced a slightly replacement with various facilities were added and modified.
In 1950, from the entrance, a sculpture was placed in the middle of the gallery and opposite to a large courtyard. On the left hand there were three different rooms included café, temporary exhibition and bookshop. And on the right hand the structure was the same and we had early European, middle European and Asian Art.
In the present day, the sculpture is still remained. But, the courtyard was reconstructed and divided into children art school, Australian Aboriginal Art and Australian Art. In the right site of the gallery all the construction except for the Australian Art are kept. Furthermore, in the left hand, the same thing happened compared to the right hand. However, the Café is now reconstructed and was split up a toilet and a café.
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university in order 73
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- the table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in r different countries from 1997 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('replacement') instead of another adjective.
...he structure of the gallery experienced a slightly replacement with various facilities were added and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous facilities were added and modified. In 1950, from the entrance, a sculpture ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, still, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93292682927 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83233512294 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.658485635 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.9 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303593031197 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123946925369 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208137842682 0.0843802449381 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230901701442 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170667036887 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.