Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
governments officials are elected by the people they serve and expected to fulfill their demands. relying on the officials own judgement without considering the people's will whom they are ought to serve could bring disastrous outcome for the government. A sense of balance between the government's judgement and the public will is more acceptable for a government to work well.
A government official's own judgment could be the one that serves his own personal interest. An official may take a decision that would benefit him or his team politically. This could hurt the will of public who voted for them through election. For example, if an official wants to transfer from one place to another where he has less popularity, he would certainly fail as a decision maker. Adolf Hitler lost his popularity for being extremely tyrannical and not withstanding with public demand. such approach may bring negative outcome for any government.
On the other hand, carrying out the will of the people they serve unquestionably is a sign of inept approach. such approach makes the government having not so prudent officials who can have their own judgement. For instance, in a local community, the most prudent member is always honoured as the decision maker of the community. he certainly does not follow the members will blindly. if there is a conflict within the community, how would he just carry out the will of both the party? he must act wise and understand the situation and bring out the best possible solution.
A sense of balance where the will of the public and the judgment of the officials must be made. take the example of any nation of the world. Before making a political relationship with another nation's government , they must call meeting internally to discuss about the pros and cons of the step. they first make sure that it would not hurt the will of public and then they take the decision that would benefit them as a political party.
In conclusion, government officials may rely on their own judgment for certain cases where there is nothing to do with meeting or not meeting public demand, but for every other case, they must make the most diplomatic approach in order to survive as a government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | zanzendegi | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | rockchisom | 79 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Sumit68 | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 66 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas What most people find difficult however is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 54
- Dr.Carp, An anthropologist 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
governments officials are elected by the people the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Relying
... and expected to fulfill their demands. relying on the officials own judgement without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ernment. A sense of balance between the governments judgement and the public will is more a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...nd not withstanding with public demand. such approach may bring negative outcome for...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...estionably is a sign of inept approach. such approach makes the government having no...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...as the decision maker of the community. he certainly does not follow the members w...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...es not follow the members will blindly. if there is a conflict within the communit...
^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t carry out the will of both the party? he must act wise and understand the situat...
^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...judgment of the officials must be made. take the example of any nation of the world....
^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...g a political relationship with another nations government , they must call meeting int...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tionship with another nations government , they must call meeting internally to di...
^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ss about the pros and cons of the step. they first make sure that it would not hurt ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92021276596 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64201367601 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484042553191 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7776388887 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349917218824 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110861417466 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972478315145 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210864626346 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704326787353 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.