Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No person is born with leadership qualities. Even though, many people will attain it through the hierarchy. Some people are really talented to inculcate leadership qualities without any background. Preference matters when it comes to leadership because many people avoid themselves in getting into such qualities even though they have one. In my opinion, leadership is not attained through natural processes but it can be inculcated if a person is interested in doing. I will be exploring by supporting points in the paragraphs hereunder.
To begin with, leadership is not only the quality with well developed rich families but it gives way for the poor people to developed and to raise voice against intolerance. Many people think that a leader should be always born in families of rich and in a family where they have political influence so that they rule the country through generations by not giving power to poverty. For instance, one of my friend working as a business analyst. She encountered many problems in her village and wanted to raise her voice to have minimum facilities for their village people to survive. For that, she stood as one of the representatives for a particular village and conducted campaigns. Later, she was lucky enough to win and helped her people to lead an extraordinary life. This shows leadership skills can come through when a person is in need or wanted to help people.
Furthermore, people always want to be in a high position where ever they are. Many people like to start their leadership skills from their campus organizations and also by conducting innumerable sports events in their school. Many people even though they have leadership skills they don't want to take part because they are too lazy enough and do not want to take risks involving them. For example, I was the head of all the sports events conducted at my schools and I organized them very carefully. Being a leader doesn't make you feel responsible but also accountable for the situations happening around you. This clearly shows that this quality will help you to behave with people around you and also teaches you to organize events with responsibility.
All in all, I vehemently assert that leadership quality is not attained naturally but a person should make an effort to have those skills. Leadership skills not only make a person be better who comes from a poor family but also it teaches us how to behave with people and organize things with much responsibility for any cultural event at your college.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Asteroids 73
- Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect 85
- burning mirror 60
- burning mirror 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...though they have leadership skills they dont want to take part because they are too ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...zed them very carefully. Being a leader doesnt make you feel responsible but also acco...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, so, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96698113208 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72907016376 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48820754717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3569366325 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164404581848 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055420727516 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406636538531 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113914124733 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233576858737 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.