Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Development of technology has made most of the things possible and children are more familiar with technological invention which consequences positive and negative impacts in today's society. A major consequence is children are being passive and using no brains to create new ideas. I am concurred with this idea and farm believe that technology destroys the ability to create something new that children are interested by fulfilling their inquisitiveness easily. I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraph.
To begin with, technology has made everything to be accessed and youths find everything whatever they want. Moreover, it destroys their quest for knowledge and results it to the laziness and influences them to be a potato on a couch. Ultimately, it only encourages them to watch TV, using computers so they engage in the fruitless activities. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. About ten years ago, when I was in my high school, I used to find my every assignments in internet after googling instead of doing myself. Furthermore, it decreased my potentiality to use my brain for completing my homework. After my parents found out, immediately they disconnected internet. As a result, I again started to work hard on my tasks moreover it compelled and motivated me to generate new ideas.
Secondly, students feel sense of belatedness because of technology. They regret to be late for any invention since they think, everything has already invented and there is nothing new to create. This fear guides them nothing to do new but explore the same thing that are created previously. To be specific, since YouTube , Google like many more technologies have been developed, youths find every topics already listed which made them frustrated and deterred. Drawing from my own experience, when I was in twelve standard, me and my friend wanted to work on a project. But when we were about to complete it, it was already done by other people and listed in google. Being in a painful state of mind, we wanted to intervene new ideas but could not found. Because of this reason, we ceased to find different ideas because there was nothing new and possibility of plagiarism. Another reason, whatever we wanted, we could easily found it without any tension so we decided not to waste out time.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly supports that technology discourages children to create new ideas because of easy accessibility of everything and by creating sense of belatedness which finally leads them to be unproductive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree It is more important to keep your old friends rather than making new friends 76
- Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to teach children to become good citizens and workers rather than benefiting them as individuals Agree Disagree 83
- Younger people enjoy more than the older people 76
- It is better for children to grow up in country side than in large city 76
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...ment of technology has made most of the things possible and children are more familiar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[2]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'regret being'.
Suggestion: regret being
...belatedness because of technology. They regret to be late for any invention since they think...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reviously. To be specific, since YouTube , Google like many more technologies have...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...the above mentioned reasons, I strongly supports that technology discourages children to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0787037037 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90668281664 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2301404268 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130167315038 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038553258361 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504416387919 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882978048643 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385299806807 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.