Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
There is a tendency that formal certificates outperformed practical experiences as well as the personal characteristics and played an essential role in the hiring decisions of several employers. This phenomenal resulted from numerous reasons and it is completely an adverse development
To begin with, there is a variety of explanations for the attentions the employers paid to the academic degrees. First and foremost, validated academic qualifications are the perfect assertion for the endeavour of the graduates. It is irrefutable that if a college student desires to get a university qualification, they must put a great effort and time on their specializes. That somehow prove that they are hard-working and persevering people. In addition, numerous believed that the applicants with an official certificate are equipped with in-depth knowledge and they are more likely to make greater contributions to the growth of the company than the ones without qualification
However, this is an inadequate notion since a proficient employee requires more than just academic knowledge. There seem to be shreds of evidence that many bachelors who achieve notable certificates still had difficulties dealing with the clients due to the shortage of life skills including communicating, interpreting or problem-solving, to mention but a few. Consequently, this not only negatively affects their work but also result in gradually losing their loyal consumers. Personal qualities, on the other hand, are also a key part in effective work productivity. By the way of illustration, there are diverse occupations that expect to work as a team rather than as an individual. Information technology worker can be a good case in point. In that case, the personalities of aggressive, bad-tempered or egotistic may pose a serious threat on the project as a whole
In conclusion, the academic qualification's prerequisite of some employer is understandable since it is a good affirmation of the hard-working and diligent of the graduates. However, the lack of soft skills and improper personal qualities may diminish the work productivity or even pose a threat to the development of the company
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 61
- what are the causes and effects of traffic congestions? 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 84
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, by the way, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49404761905 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43624616383 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574404761905 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8984538784 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230243796324 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065714313233 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411000255231 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123525220958 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281087358784 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.