The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
How to teach appropriately is a profound question, from parents to employers, they all eager to know the answer. The speaker claims that praising for positive behaviors but not blame for negative ones is the best way for education. In my view, an effective way for education need to balance between the blame and the praise, but not overly leaning to any side of it.
Positive feedback help people develop their confidence. In the stage of learning, we start from fumbling then to adept in a field. Thus, we make mistake and usually frustrated. If there are somebody can guide us and give us positive responses, it will be a great encouragement that one can develop their confidence to pursuing future achievement and withstand challenges. By contrast, if a novice is relentlessly scolding by others, their interest and will are easy to be destroyed, which is not a prospective result that an educator want to see, and also contradict the purpose of education.
On the other hand, appropriate blame help learners identify their weakness and fault, which prevent them from making same mistake again. One goal of education is to develop one’s proficiency in certain area. If an educator always afraid of hurting learner’s confidence so that withhold their blame for learners’ mistakes, not only it deprives the chance for learners improving themselves but cause the result that learners never reach fluency in that field.
And, moderate galvanization help people learn faster. While an environment of amenity is what most people wish for, an apropos pressure from blaming can help people learn more effectively and efficiently. Modern society is a highly competitive one, we have a range of things needed to be learned, many different goal needed to be pursued. Therefore, how to shorten the duration of learning is important today. Here, the proper blame and spur is the most basic and straightforward method to achieve it.
To sum up, for a teacher, an employer, or parents, acquiring the balance between positive feedback and negative feedback is essential for the effective education. Positive feedbacks help learners develop confidence, and help them not to give up in their rudimentary stages; negative feedbacks foster learners’ proficiency as well as boosts their potential of efficiency and efficacy. Both of them cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tool of human minds 75
- It is the artist not the critic who gives society something of lasting value 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- While some leaders in government sports industry and other areas attribute their success to a well developed sense of competition a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation 83
- Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society s past but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes In such situations modern development sho 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...a range of things needed to be learned, many different goal needed to be pursued. Therefore, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87146627345 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5926266218 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.315789474 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187121073436 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532802240192 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582766680441 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108844381472 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07330223964 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.